A service level contract is an agreement between two or more parties, one being the customer and other service providers. It may be a formal or informal legally binding “treaty” (for example. B internal relations within the department). The agreement may include separate organizations or different teams within an organization. Contracts between the service provider and other third parties are often referred to as SLAs (wrongly) – the level of service having been set by the (main) customer, there can be no “agreement” between third parties; these agreements are simply “contracts.” However, operational agreements or olea agreements can be used by internal groups to support ALS. If an aspect of a service has not been agreed with the customer, it is not an “ALS.” Most service providers provide statistics, often through an online portal. There, customers can check whether ALS is being met and whether they are entitled to service credits or other penalties under ALS. Consistent and defined performance controls are essential to determine the effectiveness of a service provider in each program. Understanding what is being verified, how they are checking and how this data has an impact on your program, such as the above tracking and reporting, is something consistent in THE WINNER SLA. Often, ALS will include an amendment control procedure that defines a mechanism for agreeing and recording changes to the agreement or services to be provided. In an agreement of any length or complexity, it is inevitable that changes will be made to services (which affects service levels) and an agreed and properly implemented change control procedure is essential. In order to assess the usefulness of the contract in relation to the service level agreement, we examine the components that each of them provides and to whom it benefits.
Then, by providing each service one after the other, the customer should indicate the expected performance standards. It depends on the service. In the “Reporting” example above, a possible level of service can be 99.5%. However, this issue needs to be carefully considered. Often a customer wants performance standards at the highest level. In practice, this is understandable, but it could be impossible, unnecessary or very expensive. On the other hand, the service provider can make it clear that service levels should be deliberately low to ensure that the service can be provided at a competitive price. It`s a matter of evaluation, and the client needs to carefully evaluate each level of service – it`s often that different services are weighted differently depending on the size of the business. Performance standards for the availability of an online service are generally high, as it is essential that the customer ensures constant availability of the service. Other individual services may be less important, and service levels for these may be set at a lower level.